Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Labe, Ústí nad Labem, levý břeh – protipovodňová ochrana na Q100 na Labi
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi |
8
Ø7 in industry |
|
Protipovodňová ochrana obce Zálezlice
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi |
11
Ø7 in industry |
|
Lovosicko (Píšťany, Lovosice) - protipovodňová ochrana na Q100 na Labi - stavební část, dodatečné stavební práce
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi |
Not disclosed
Ø7 in industry |
|
Jeřice, Chrastava, obnova vodního toku v ř. km 0,00 – 3,45
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi |
9
Ø7 in industry |
|
Jizera, Benátky nad Jizerou, protipovodňová ochrana
Regulace řek a ochrana před povodněmi |
3
Ø7 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Strabag Rail a.s. |
2 | 338,121,243 |
|
Eurovia Cs, a.s. |
9 | 294,158,479 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
10 | 287,323,089 |
|
Ohl Žs, a.s. |
5 | 194,902,332 |
|
Labská, strojní a stavební společnost s.r.o. |
9 | 77,293,753 |
| Other suppliers | 79 | 655,627,204 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Strabag Rail a.s. |
2 | 338,121,243 |
|
Eurovia Cs, a.s. |
9 | 294,158,479 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
10 | 287,323,089 |
|
Ohl Žs, a.s. |
5 | 194,902,332 |
|
Labská, strojní a stavební společnost s.r.o. |
9 | 77,293,753 |
|
Aquasys spol. s r.o. |
2 | 71,662,105 |
|
Zvánovec a.s. |
2 | 64,446,598 |
|
Rekultivace Ústí nad Labem, s.r.o. |
1 | 61,600,000 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 46,225,421 |
|
České přístavy, a.s. |
6 | 31,929,209 |
|
Evropská Vodní Doprava-sped., s.r.o. |
3 | 31,692,463 |
|
Aquatis a.s. |
1 | 29,236,490 |
|
Rovina, a.s. |
3 | 26,121,051 |
|
Sovis Cz, a.s. |
1 | 25,405,258 |
|
Čkd Blansko Small Hydro, s.r.o. |
1 | 24,884,000 |
|
Navimor - Invest S.a., odštěpný závod Praha |
2 | 22,649,470 |
|
Croy s.r.o. |
1 | 19,994,970 |
|
Nowastav akciová společnost |
2 | 15,237,843 |
|
Vodní Díla - Tbd a.s. |
5 | 13,956,780 |
|
Bak stavební společnost, a.s. |
1 | 13,720,175 |
|
Hpst, s.r.o. |
2 | 11,941,531 |
|
Vdp Stavby a.s. |
2 | 11,411,633 |
|
H.c.m. s.r.o. |
1 | 10,988,160 |
|
Agpol s.r.o. |
1 | 10,401,456 |
|
Agrico, s.r.o. |
4 | 8,743,000 |
|
Hochtief Cz a. s. |
1 | 7,900,000 |
|
Arcadis Cz a.s. |
1 | 7,640,250 |
|
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s. |
1 | 7,272,524 |
|
Montáže Čakovice s.r.o. |
1 | 6,877,540 |
|
Stavremo-pce a.s. "v likvidaci" |
2 | 6,713,995 |
|
Insky spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,320,438 |
|
Lesostavby Frýdek-místek a. s. |
1 | 5,769,992 |
|
Raeder & Falge s.r.o. |
1 | 5,592,897 |
|
Jesko Cz s. r. o. |
1 | 4,960,300 |
|
Stavoplast Kl spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,940,000 |
|
Topkarmoto s.r.o. |
1 | 4,888,400 |
|
Princip a.s. |
1 | 4,743,920 |
|
A G I Hk spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,073,935 |
|
Hyundai Motor Czech s.r.o. |
4 | 3,449,334 |
|
Stratos Auto, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 3,341,500 |
|
Olfin Car s.r.o. |
3 | 3,258,547 |
|
P O P R spol. s r.o. |
1 | 3,049,000 |
|
Smp Cz, a.s. |
1 | 2,848,445 |
|
Geoinspect s.r.o. |
1 | 2,069,410 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. |
1 | 1,809,300 |
|
Porsche Inter Auto Cz spol. s r.o. |
2 | 1,420,507 |
|
Edlin, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,314,280 |
|
Ing. Eduard Sýkora - Esako |
2 | 1,085,346 |
|
O2 Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 669,835 |
|
Autocentrum Barth a.s. |
1 | 617,751 |
|
s.n.e.t., spol. s r.o. |
1 | 560,790 |
|
Habau Cz s.r.o. |
1 | 191,355 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (3 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 5% (2 from 38) |
| Division into lots | 26% (10 from 38) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 38) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 38) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 1,847,426,107 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 1,984,821,995 |
| Total | 3,832,248,102 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
| Name | Misconduct |
|---|---|
| Oleška, Heřmanice, Dětřichov, obnova vodního toku, ř. km 0,000 - 5,898 | NO |
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Labe, Ústí nad Labem, levý břeh – protipovodňová ochrana na Q100 na Labi - dodatečné stavební práce Dodatečné práce |
- | 24,821,243 |
|
Labe, Jaroměř, zvýšení ochrany města rekonstrukcí koryta a hrázemi - dodatečné stavební práce Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody), Dodatečné práce |
- | 13,720,175 |
|
VD Josefův Důl, rekonstrukce MVE Not disclosed |
- | 6,877,540 |
|
VD Bedřichov, rekonstrukce MVE Not disclosed |
- | 6,622,743 |
|
Lužická Nisa, Jablonec nad Nisou, zvýšení ochrany města převodem povodňových průtoků přes VD Mšeno – stavební část, dodatečné stavební práce Not disclosed |
- | 6,599,982 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 21% |
| Cancelled contracts | 4% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.43 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 6% (7 from 114) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 114) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 114) |
| Missing call for tenders | 28% (32 from 114) |
| Missing winning price | 0% ( from 114) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 114) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 59% (zakázek z ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.10 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 114) |
| Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 3% (3 from 114) |
| Subcontractor share above 50 % | 3% (3 from 114) |
| Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 114) |
| Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 114) |
| Supplier donating to political party | 7% (8 from 114) |
| Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 11% (13 from 114) |
Has buyer answered our information request? detailed info
Full disclosure
Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.
